Peer Review Process
Amnesti: Jurnal Hukum will publish the only paper strictly following Amnesti: Jurnal Hukum guidelines and manuscript preparation. Those papers are read by editorial members (upon field of specialization) and will be screened by Managing Editor to meet necessary criteria of Amnesti: Jurnal Hukum publication. Manuscripts will be sent to two peer-reviewers based on their historical experience in reviewing manuscript or based on their field of specialization. Amnesti: Jurnal Hukum has reviewing forms in order to keep same items reviewed by two reviewers. Then editorial board will make a decision upon the reviewers comments or advice. Reviewers will give their assessment on originality, clarity of presentation, contribution to the field/science, Amnesti: Jurnal Hukum has four kind of decisions:.
- Accepted, as it is
- Accepted by Minor Revisions (let authors revised with stipulated time)
- Accepted by Major Revisions (let authors revised with stipulated time)
- Declined (generally, on grounds of outside of scope and aim, major technical description problems, lack of clarity of presentation)
For checking Plagiarism, Amnesti: Jurnal Hukum Editorial Board will screen plagiarism using Turnitin Program maximum 30%. If it is found plagiarism indication, editorial board will reject manuscript immediately.