Bona Fide Residency sebagai Syarat Pencalonan dalam Pemilihan Umum Legislatif Anggota DPR dan DPRD: Quo Vadis?

Abstract

Wacana memperketat syarat domisili dalam pencalonan anggota DPR dan DPRD kembali mengemuka sebagai upaya untuk memperkuat representasi kepentingan lokal. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis konstitusionalitas, landasan teoretis, dan feasibilitas penerapan syarat domisili di Indonesia, serta merumuskan alternatif kebijakan dalam desain sistem pemilu dalam rangka memperkuat representasi kepentingan lokal. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif dengan menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan, komparatif, dan konseptual. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa eksistensi syarat domisili justru bermasalah secara konseptual. Alih-alih menjamin representasi secara deskriptif ataupun substantif, ia justru menghambat masuknya caleg berkualitas dan membatasi pilihan dari pemilih. Secara konstitusional, belum terdapat satu pun preseden yang menguji konstitusionalitas dalam konteks pemilu anggota DPR dan DPRD. Berkaca pada praktik di Amerika Serikat, penerapan doktrin bona fide residency justru menimbulkan kompleksitas administratif dan beban litigasi yang eksesif bagi penyelenggara pemilu dan sistem peradilan. Penelitian ini menawarkan alternatif solusi kebijakan melalui rekayasa sistem pemilu dengan memperkecil besaran dapil dan memprioritaskan kohesivitas wilayah dalam proses penyusunan dapil. Pendekatan ini jauh lebih efektif dalam menciptakan insentif bagi caleg maupun petahana untuk lebih responsif terhadap kepentingan lokal, sekaligus mendorong penyederhanaan partai politik tanpa mencederai hak konstitusional warga negara.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ali, M. M., Hilipito, M. R., & Asy’ari, S. (2016). Tindak Lanjut Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi yang Bersifat Konstitusional Bersyarat Serta Memuat Norma Baru. Jurnal Konstitusi, 12(3), 631–662. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk12310

André, A., Depauw, S., & Deschouwer, K. (2016). Institutional constraints and territorial representation. In M. Bühlmann & J. Fivaz (Eds.), Political Representation: Roles, representatives and the represented (pp. 48–67). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315665788

Arifin, F., Maarif, I., Pantja Astawa, I. G., Abdullah, M. K., & Bahri, R. A. (2025). Open Legal Policy Criteria in the Constitutional Court Decision: An eval_uation and Recommendation. PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law), 12(2), 216–233. https://doi.org/10.22304/2442-9325.1335

Arnesen, S., & Peters, Y. (2018). The Legitimacy of Representation: How Descriptive, Formal, and Responsiveness Representation Affect the Acceptability of Political Decisions. Comparative Political Studies, 51(7), 868–899. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414017720702

Barceló, J., & Muraoka, T. (2018). The effect of variance in district magnitude on party system inflation. Electoral Studies, 54, 44–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2018.04.016

Bhat, P. I. (2019). Idea and Methods of Legal Research. Oxford University Press.

Borghetto, E., Santana‐Pereira, J., & Freire, A. (2020). Parliamentary Questions as an Instrument for Geographic Representation: The Hard Case of Portugal. Swiss Political Science Review, 26(1), 10–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/spsr.12387

Bursać, D., & Radujko, D. (2023). Spatial Distance and Representation in Closed PR List: Revisiting the U-Curve Argument. Politics in Central Europe, 19(3), 471–487. https://doi.org/10.2478/pce-2023-0023

Campbell, R., & Cowley, P. (2014). What Voters Want: Reactions to Candidate Characteristics in a Survey Experiment. Political Studies, 62(4), 745–765. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12048

Chiru, M. (2022). Electoral incentives for territorial representation in the European Parliament. Journal of European Integration, 44(2), 277–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2021.1890067

Christiani, T. A. (2016). Normative and Empirical Research Methods: Their Usefulness and Relevance in the Study of Law as an Object. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 219, 201–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.006

Clegg, P., Stæhr Harder, M. M., Nauclér, E., & Alomar, R. C. (2022). Parliamentary representation of overseas territories in the metropolis: a comparative analysis. Commonwealth & Comparative Politics, 60(3), 229–253. https://doi.org/10.1080/14662043.2022.2065623

Däubler, T. (2020). National policy for local reasons: how MPs represent party and geographical constituency through initiatives on social security. Acta Politica, 55(3), 472–491. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41269-018-0125-x

Domínguez, P., & Portillo-Pérez, M. F. (2023). Territorial Dynamics of Spanish Members of Parliament (1977–2020). Nationalities Papers, 51(5), 1105–1122. https://doi.org/10.1017/nps.2022.6

Failaq, M. R. F., & Monati, R. (2023). Assessing the Probability of Affirmative Action Women’s Quota for Members of the Regional Representative Council (DPD). Jurnal Bina Praja, 15(3), 621–637. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.15.2023.621-637

Faludi, A. (2016). EU territorial cohesion, a contradiction in terms. Planning Theory & Practice, 17(2), 302–313. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2016.1154657

Gimpel, J. G., & Harbridge-Yong, L. (2020). Conflicting Goals of Redistricting: Do Districts That Maximize Competition Reckon with Communities of Interest? Election Law Journal: Rules, Politics, and Policy, 19(4), 451–471. https://doi.org/10.1089/elj.2019.0576

Hadi, F., & Gandryani, F. (2024). Penguatan Kaderisasi Partai Politik melalui Pemberlakuan Syarat Masa Keanggotaan Partai Politik dalam Pemilihan Legislatif. Majalah Hukum Nasional, 54(2), 157–179. https://doi.org/10.33331/mhn.v54i2.400

Hale v. State of Mississippi Democratic Executive Committee (2015). https://law.justia.com/cases/mississippi/supreme-court/2015/2015-ec-00965-sct.html

Handley, L. (2022). Drawing Electoral Districts to Promote Minority Representation. Representation, 58(3), 373–389. https://doi.org/10.1080/00344893.2020.1815076

Harahap, D. (2025). Masyarakat Resah karena Banyak Caleg Berdomisili tidak di Dapil Sendiri. Media Indonesia. https://mediaindonesia.com/politik-dan-hukum/749483/masyarakat-resah-karena-banyak-caleg-berdomisili-tidak-di-dapil-sendiri

Horton, B. (2023). An Issue of First Impression? State Constitutional Law and Judging the Qualifications of Candidates for the House and Senate. Nebraska Law Review, 102(1), 93–170. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nlr/vol102/iss1/4

Hunt, C. R., & Fontana, D. (2025). Is Some Politics Still Local? Voter Preferences for Local Candidates. Political Behavior, 47(1), 167–189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-024-09946-6

Johns, A. (2016). The Case for Political Candidacy as a Fundamental Human Right. Human Rights Law Review, 16(1), 29–54. https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngv036

Krisna, A., Rejeki, S., & Wisanggeni, S. P. (2024). Ribuan Caleg Asal Jakarta Mewakili Daerah Pemilihan Lain. Kompas. https://www.kompas.id/artikel/caleg-dpr-menguji-peruntungan-di-pelbagai-daerah

Lemi, D. C. (2022). What is a Descriptive Representative? PS: Political Science & Politics, 55(2), 290–292. https://doi.org/10.1017/S104909652100158X

Manalu, E. H., Harahap, H., & Ridho, H. (2022). Kualitas Daftar Pemilih Tetap pada Pemilihan Umum Serentak Tahun 2019 di Komisi Pemilihan Umum Kabupaten Humbang Hasundutan. PERSPEKTIF, 11(3), 1092–1104. https://doi.org/10.31289/perspektif.v11i3.6427

Marzuki, P. M. (2017). Penelitian Hukum: Edisi Revisi. Prenada Media Group.

Mazo, E. D. (2016). Residency and Democracy: Durational Residency Requirements from the Framers to the Present. Florida State University Law Review, 43, 611–678. https://ir.law.fsu.edu/lr/vol43/iss2/8

Meredith v. Clarksdale Democratic Executive Committee, et Al. (2021). https://law.justia.com/cases/mississippi/supreme-court/2022/2021-ec-00305-sct.html

Miller, K. (2015). New Jersey’s Constitutional Residency Requirement for State Legislature Candidates: A Roadmap for Challengers and a Cry for Reform During Re-Districting Years. Rutgers Law Review, 67(1), 283–334. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2590348

Mourita, E. H. (2024). Urgensi Pembentukan Daerah Pemilihan Khusus Luar Negeri dalam Pemilihan Umum Anggota Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat. Jurist-Diction, 7(4), 585–620. https://doi.org/10.20473/jd.v7i4.42781

Mügge, L. M., & Erzeel, S. (2016). Double Jeopardy or Multiple Advantage? Intersectionality and Political Representation. Parliamentary Affairs, 69(3), 499–511. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsv059

Muraoka, T., & Barceló, J. (2019). The effect of district magnitude on turnout: Quasi-experimental evidence from nonpartisan elections under SNTV. Party Politics, 25(4), 632–639. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068817740337

Nurhasim, M. (2020). Paradoks Pemilu Serentak 2019: Memperkokoh Multipartai Ekstrem di Indonesia. Jurnal Penelitian Politik, 16(2), 125–136. https://doi.org/10.14203/jpp.v16i2.819

Pitts, M. J. (2016). Against Residency Requirements. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 2015(1), 341–381. http://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/uclf/vol2015/iss1/11

Prihatmoko, J. J. (2021). Dewan Perwakilan Daerah (DPD): Antara Perwakilan Daerah dan Perwakilan Partai Politik. Spektrum: Jurnal Ilmu Politik Hubungan Internasional, 18(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.31942/spektrum.v18i1.4103

Rand, J. L. (2016). Carpetbagger Battle Cry: Scrutinizing Durational Residency Requirements for State and Local Offices. Rutgers Journal of Law & Public Policy, 13(3), 243–265. https://rutgerspolicyjournal.org/2017/02/26/carpetbagger-battle-cry-scrutinizing-durational-residency-requirements-state-and-local-offices/

Salkin, W. (2023). Speaking for Others from the Bench. Legal Theory, 29(2), 151–184. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1352325223000083

Siboy, A. (2022). Alternatif Desain Penyelenggaraan Pemilihan Umum Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi. Arena Hukum, 15(1), 200–219. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2022.01501.10

Subkhi, M. I. (2020). Redesain Pendaftaran Pemilih Pasca Pemilu 2019. Jurnal Penelitian Politik, 16(2), 137–154. https://doi.org/10.14203/jpp.v16i2.797

Suhendarto, B. P., & Saraswati, R. (2022). Implikasi Hukum Status Kewarganegaraan Asing Pada Calon Terpilih Dalam Pemilihan Kepala Daerah. Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, 4(3), 382–401. https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v4i3.382-401

Taekema, S. (2018). Theoretical and Normative Frameworks for Legal Research: Putting Theory into Practice. Law and Method, 2018(2), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.5553/REM/.000031

Taufiqurrohman, M. M. (2021). Meninjau Penerapan Ambang Batas Pemilihan pada Sistem Pemilihan Umum Proporsional di Indonesia. Politika: Jurnal Ilmu Politik, 12(1), 128–143. https://doi.org/10.14710/politika.12.1.2021.128-143

Tolson, F. (2019). The Elections Clause and the Underenforcement of Federal Law. The Yale Law Journal Forum, 129, 171–184. https://yalelawjournal.org/forum/the-elections-clause-and-the-underenforcement-of-federal-law

Widjaja, A. H. (2017). Implikasi Konstitusionalitas Pengaturan Syarat Domisili Calon Kepala Desa. Jurnal Konstitusi, 14(2), 351–373. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1426

Wikstrom v. Johnson (2024). https://www.lrl.mn.gov/archive/Court_Cases/62-CV-24-7378/56.pdf

Yablon, N. (2021). “Nation of Carpetbaggers”: Mobility, Materiality, and the Emergence of a Counter-Reconstruction Epithet. Journal of American History, 108(3), 457–491. https://doi.org/10.1093/jahist/jaab229

Published
2026-02-05
How to Cite
Hantoro, B. F. (2026). Bona Fide Residency sebagai Syarat Pencalonan dalam Pemilihan Umum Legislatif Anggota DPR dan DPRD: Quo Vadis?. Amnesti: Jurnal Hukum, 8(1), 78-93. Retrieved from https://jurnal.umpwr.ac.id/amnesti/article/view/7210
Section
Articles