Bona Fide Residency sebagai Syarat Pencalonan dalam Pemilihan Umum Legislatif Anggota DPR dan DPRD: Quo Vadis?
Abstract
Wacana memperketat syarat domisili dalam pencalonan anggota DPR dan DPRD kembali mengemuka sebagai upaya untuk memperkuat representasi kepentingan lokal. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis konstitusionalitas, landasan teoretis, dan feasibilitas penerapan syarat domisili di Indonesia, serta merumuskan alternatif kebijakan dalam desain sistem pemilu dalam rangka memperkuat representasi kepentingan lokal. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif dengan menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan, komparatif, dan konseptual. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa eksistensi syarat domisili justru bermasalah secara konseptual. Alih-alih menjamin representasi secara deskriptif ataupun substantif, ia justru menghambat masuknya caleg berkualitas dan membatasi pilihan dari pemilih. Secara konstitusional, belum terdapat satu pun preseden yang menguji konstitusionalitas dalam konteks pemilu anggota DPR dan DPRD. Berkaca pada praktik di Amerika Serikat, penerapan doktrin bona fide residency justru menimbulkan kompleksitas administratif dan beban litigasi yang eksesif bagi penyelenggara pemilu dan sistem peradilan. Penelitian ini menawarkan alternatif solusi kebijakan melalui rekayasa sistem pemilu dengan memperkecil besaran dapil dan memprioritaskan kohesivitas wilayah dalam proses penyusunan dapil. Pendekatan ini jauh lebih efektif dalam menciptakan insentif bagi caleg maupun petahana untuk lebih responsif terhadap kepentingan lokal, sekaligus mendorong penyederhanaan partai politik tanpa mencederai hak konstitusional warga negara.
Downloads
References
Ali, M. M., Hilipito, M. R., & Asy’ari, S. (2016). Tindak Lanjut Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi yang Bersifat Konstitusional Bersyarat Serta Memuat Norma Baru. Jurnal Konstitusi, 12(3), 631–662. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk12310
André, A., Depauw, S., & Deschouwer, K. (2016). Institutional constraints and territorial representation. In M. Bühlmann & J. Fivaz (Eds.), Political Representation: Roles, representatives and the represented (pp. 48–67). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315665788
Arifin, F., Maarif, I., Pantja Astawa, I. G., Abdullah, M. K., & Bahri, R. A. (2025). Open Legal Policy Criteria in the Constitutional Court Decision: An eval_uation and Recommendation. PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law), 12(2), 216–233. https://doi.org/10.22304/2442-9325.1335
Arnesen, S., & Peters, Y. (2018). The Legitimacy of Representation: How Descriptive, Formal, and Responsiveness Representation Affect the Acceptability of Political Decisions. Comparative Political Studies, 51(7), 868–899. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414017720702
Barceló, J., & Muraoka, T. (2018). The effect of variance in district magnitude on party system inflation. Electoral Studies, 54, 44–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2018.04.016
Bhat, P. I. (2019). Idea and Methods of Legal Research. Oxford University Press.
Borghetto, E., Santana‐Pereira, J., & Freire, A. (2020). Parliamentary Questions as an Instrument for Geographic Representation: The Hard Case of Portugal. Swiss Political Science Review, 26(1), 10–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/spsr.12387
Bursać, D., & Radujko, D. (2023). Spatial Distance and Representation in Closed PR List: Revisiting the U-Curve Argument. Politics in Central Europe, 19(3), 471–487. https://doi.org/10.2478/pce-2023-0023
Campbell, R., & Cowley, P. (2014). What Voters Want: Reactions to Candidate Characteristics in a Survey Experiment. Political Studies, 62(4), 745–765. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12048
Chiru, M. (2022). Electoral incentives for territorial representation in the European Parliament. Journal of European Integration, 44(2), 277–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2021.1890067
Christiani, T. A. (2016). Normative and Empirical Research Methods: Their Usefulness and Relevance in the Study of Law as an Object. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 219, 201–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.006
Clegg, P., Stæhr Harder, M. M., Nauclér, E., & Alomar, R. C. (2022). Parliamentary representation of overseas territories in the metropolis: a comparative analysis. Commonwealth & Comparative Politics, 60(3), 229–253. https://doi.org/10.1080/14662043.2022.2065623
Däubler, T. (2020). National policy for local reasons: how MPs represent party and geographical constituency through initiatives on social security. Acta Politica, 55(3), 472–491. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41269-018-0125-x
Domínguez, P., & Portillo-Pérez, M. F. (2023). Territorial Dynamics of Spanish Members of Parliament (1977–2020). Nationalities Papers, 51(5), 1105–1122. https://doi.org/10.1017/nps.2022.6
Failaq, M. R. F., & Monati, R. (2023). Assessing the Probability of Affirmative Action Women’s Quota for Members of the Regional Representative Council (DPD). Jurnal Bina Praja, 15(3), 621–637. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.15.2023.621-637
Faludi, A. (2016). EU territorial cohesion, a contradiction in terms. Planning Theory & Practice, 17(2), 302–313. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2016.1154657
Gimpel, J. G., & Harbridge-Yong, L. (2020). Conflicting Goals of Redistricting: Do Districts That Maximize Competition Reckon with Communities of Interest? Election Law Journal: Rules, Politics, and Policy, 19(4), 451–471. https://doi.org/10.1089/elj.2019.0576
Hadi, F., & Gandryani, F. (2024). Penguatan Kaderisasi Partai Politik melalui Pemberlakuan Syarat Masa Keanggotaan Partai Politik dalam Pemilihan Legislatif. Majalah Hukum Nasional, 54(2), 157–179. https://doi.org/10.33331/mhn.v54i2.400
Hale v. State of Mississippi Democratic Executive Committee (2015). https://law.justia.com/cases/mississippi/supreme-court/2015/2015-ec-00965-sct.html
Handley, L. (2022). Drawing Electoral Districts to Promote Minority Representation. Representation, 58(3), 373–389. https://doi.org/10.1080/00344893.2020.1815076
Harahap, D. (2025). Masyarakat Resah karena Banyak Caleg Berdomisili tidak di Dapil Sendiri. Media Indonesia. https://mediaindonesia.com/politik-dan-hukum/749483/masyarakat-resah-karena-banyak-caleg-berdomisili-tidak-di-dapil-sendiri
Horton, B. (2023). An Issue of First Impression? State Constitutional Law and Judging the Qualifications of Candidates for the House and Senate. Nebraska Law Review, 102(1), 93–170. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nlr/vol102/iss1/4
Hunt, C. R., & Fontana, D. (2025). Is Some Politics Still Local? Voter Preferences for Local Candidates. Political Behavior, 47(1), 167–189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-024-09946-6
Johns, A. (2016). The Case for Political Candidacy as a Fundamental Human Right. Human Rights Law Review, 16(1), 29–54. https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngv036
Krisna, A., Rejeki, S., & Wisanggeni, S. P. (2024). Ribuan Caleg Asal Jakarta Mewakili Daerah Pemilihan Lain. Kompas. https://www.kompas.id/artikel/caleg-dpr-menguji-peruntungan-di-pelbagai-daerah
Lemi, D. C. (2022). What is a Descriptive Representative? PS: Political Science & Politics, 55(2), 290–292. https://doi.org/10.1017/S104909652100158X
Manalu, E. H., Harahap, H., & Ridho, H. (2022). Kualitas Daftar Pemilih Tetap pada Pemilihan Umum Serentak Tahun 2019 di Komisi Pemilihan Umum Kabupaten Humbang Hasundutan. PERSPEKTIF, 11(3), 1092–1104. https://doi.org/10.31289/perspektif.v11i3.6427
Marzuki, P. M. (2017). Penelitian Hukum: Edisi Revisi. Prenada Media Group.
Mazo, E. D. (2016). Residency and Democracy: Durational Residency Requirements from the Framers to the Present. Florida State University Law Review, 43, 611–678. https://ir.law.fsu.edu/lr/vol43/iss2/8
Meredith v. Clarksdale Democratic Executive Committee, et Al. (2021). https://law.justia.com/cases/mississippi/supreme-court/2022/2021-ec-00305-sct.html
Miller, K. (2015). New Jersey’s Constitutional Residency Requirement for State Legislature Candidates: A Roadmap for Challengers and a Cry for Reform During Re-Districting Years. Rutgers Law Review, 67(1), 283–334. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2590348
Mourita, E. H. (2024). Urgensi Pembentukan Daerah Pemilihan Khusus Luar Negeri dalam Pemilihan Umum Anggota Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat. Jurist-Diction, 7(4), 585–620. https://doi.org/10.20473/jd.v7i4.42781
Mügge, L. M., & Erzeel, S. (2016). Double Jeopardy or Multiple Advantage? Intersectionality and Political Representation. Parliamentary Affairs, 69(3), 499–511. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsv059
Muraoka, T., & Barceló, J. (2019). The effect of district magnitude on turnout: Quasi-experimental evidence from nonpartisan elections under SNTV. Party Politics, 25(4), 632–639. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068817740337
Nurhasim, M. (2020). Paradoks Pemilu Serentak 2019: Memperkokoh Multipartai Ekstrem di Indonesia. Jurnal Penelitian Politik, 16(2), 125–136. https://doi.org/10.14203/jpp.v16i2.819
Pitts, M. J. (2016). Against Residency Requirements. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 2015(1), 341–381. http://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/uclf/vol2015/iss1/11
Prihatmoko, J. J. (2021). Dewan Perwakilan Daerah (DPD): Antara Perwakilan Daerah dan Perwakilan Partai Politik. Spektrum: Jurnal Ilmu Politik Hubungan Internasional, 18(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.31942/spektrum.v18i1.4103
Rand, J. L. (2016). Carpetbagger Battle Cry: Scrutinizing Durational Residency Requirements for State and Local Offices. Rutgers Journal of Law & Public Policy, 13(3), 243–265. https://rutgerspolicyjournal.org/2017/02/26/carpetbagger-battle-cry-scrutinizing-durational-residency-requirements-state-and-local-offices/
Salkin, W. (2023). Speaking for Others from the Bench. Legal Theory, 29(2), 151–184. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1352325223000083
Siboy, A. (2022). Alternatif Desain Penyelenggaraan Pemilihan Umum Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi. Arena Hukum, 15(1), 200–219. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2022.01501.10
Subkhi, M. I. (2020). Redesain Pendaftaran Pemilih Pasca Pemilu 2019. Jurnal Penelitian Politik, 16(2), 137–154. https://doi.org/10.14203/jpp.v16i2.797
Suhendarto, B. P., & Saraswati, R. (2022). Implikasi Hukum Status Kewarganegaraan Asing Pada Calon Terpilih Dalam Pemilihan Kepala Daerah. Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, 4(3), 382–401. https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v4i3.382-401
Taekema, S. (2018). Theoretical and Normative Frameworks for Legal Research: Putting Theory into Practice. Law and Method, 2018(2), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.5553/REM/.000031
Taufiqurrohman, M. M. (2021). Meninjau Penerapan Ambang Batas Pemilihan pada Sistem Pemilihan Umum Proporsional di Indonesia. Politika: Jurnal Ilmu Politik, 12(1), 128–143. https://doi.org/10.14710/politika.12.1.2021.128-143
Tolson, F. (2019). The Elections Clause and the Underenforcement of Federal Law. The Yale Law Journal Forum, 129, 171–184. https://yalelawjournal.org/forum/the-elections-clause-and-the-underenforcement-of-federal-law
Widjaja, A. H. (2017). Implikasi Konstitusionalitas Pengaturan Syarat Domisili Calon Kepala Desa. Jurnal Konstitusi, 14(2), 351–373. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1426
Wikstrom v. Johnson (2024). https://www.lrl.mn.gov/archive/Court_Cases/62-CV-24-7378/56.pdf
Yablon, N. (2021). “Nation of Carpetbaggers”: Mobility, Materiality, and the Emergence of a Counter-Reconstruction Epithet. Journal of American History, 108(3), 457–491. https://doi.org/10.1093/jahist/jaab229
Copyright (c) 2026 Amnesti: Jurnal Hukum

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.




