Reassessing Judicial Reasoning on the Cancellation of Land Sale and Purchase Agreements Due to Breach of Contract: Lessons from Decision No. 305/Pdt.G/2024/Pn.Bks

Authors

  • Diana Angelicha Universitas Esa Unggul, Jakarta Barat, Indonesia
  • Rita Alfiana Universitas Esa Unggul, Jakarta Barat, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37729/amnesti.v8i2.8108

Abstract

This research is motivated by disputes over Land Sale and Purchase Agreements (PPJB) arising from property speculation that threatens the rights of landowners acting in good faith. This study aims to analyse the judge's legal considerations in determining the legal certainty of the disputed object in Bekasi District Court Decision Number 305/Pdt.G/2024/PN.Bks and examine the legal implications of PPJB cancellation for land ownership status. This research employs a normative juridical method with analytical-descriptive specifications, supported by Prof. R. Subekti's Contract Theory and Jan Michiel Otto's Legal Certainty Theory. The results show that the Panel of Judges applied procedural law by issuing a default judgment under Article 125 of the HIR and declaring the Defendant in default under Article 1243 of the Civil Code for failing to pay the second to fourth instalments and ignoring two summonses. By considering the litigation history of the 36,030 m² land up to the Supreme Court, the Court resolved the legal uncertainty and affirmed the Plaintiff's position as the rightful heir. The cancellation of the PPJB as an obligatory agreement triggers restitutio in integrum, restoring each party's legal position to the state before the agreement. Doctrinally, the decision provides preventive protection for the legal status of the land under Article 23 of PP No. 24/1997. This study contributes to Indonesian contract law by demonstrating the integration of legal certainty and contractual restitution in resolving PPJB disputes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Afifah, S. A. (2020). Analisis Yuridis Pembatalan Akta Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli (PPJB) Hak Atas Tanah. Syiah Kuala Law Journal, 4(2), 123–140. https://doi.org/10.24815/sklj.v4i2.17021

Ali, M., & Hifni, M. (2025). Analisis Yuridis terhadap Pengesampingan Pasal 1266 KUH Perdata dalam Kasus Pengakhiran Suatu Perjanjian Karena Terjadinya Wanprestasi. Rewang Rencang : Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis, 6(4), 1–13.

Dalimunthe, H. A., Sutiarnoto, & Suprayitno. (2026). Akibat Hukum Gagalnya Pelunasan Harga Tanah Dalam Akta Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli (PPJB) (Studi Putusan No . 7 / Pdt . G / 2024 / PN Byl). Pagaruyuang Law Journal, 10(1), 196–213.

Fakhrizal, N. A. (2017). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Ahli Waris Yang Memperoleh Warisan Tanah Absentee. Perspektif, 22(3), 248–257.

Joesoef, I. E. (2022). Hukum Perjanjian: Asas, Teori, & Praktik. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Kareliana, A., Pamungkas, M. N., Husna, S. M., & Daniar, N. A. S. (2024). Kekuatan Hukum Akta Notaris dan Ppat dalam Peralihan Hak Atas Tanah Belum Terdaftar pada Akta Jual Beli dan Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli. Pediaqu: Jurnal Pendidikan Sosial Dan Humaniora, 4(2), 1–14. https://www.bajangjournal.com/index.php/JIRK/article/view/8744

Klinik Hukumonline. (2011). Pengecualian terhadap Pasal 1266 dan Pasal 1267 Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata dalam Perjanjian. Https://Www.Hukumonline.Com. https://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/a/pengesampingan-pasal-1266-dan-pasal-1267-kuhper-dalam-perjanjian-lt4d534a209bbf4/

LHS & Partners Law Firm. (2026). Lawsuit for Breach of Contract. Https://Lhs-Lawfirm.Com. https://lhs-lawfirm.com/layanan/gugatan-perbuatan-wanprestasi/

Marilang. (2017). Hukum Perikatan: Perikatan yang Lahir dari Perjanjian. Indonesia Prime.

Marzuki, P. M. (2009). Penelitian Hukum.

Octariani, V. A., Sigit, A. P., & Lukman, A. (2021). Pembatalan Akta Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli Ruko Akibat Wanprestasi. Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Kenotariatan, 10(39), 173–186. https://doi.org/10.28946/rpt.v10i2.1452

Otto, J. M., & Hoekema, A. (2012). Fair Land Governance - How to Legalise Land Rights for Rural Development.

Rahmawati, D., Silalahi, A. K., & Fujiarti, T. S. (2025). Putusan Ma Nomor 3459 K/PDT Mengenai Wanprestasi terhadap perjanjian Jual Beli Tanah. Rewang Rencang : Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis, 6(4), 1–19. https://jhlg.rewangrencang.com/

Rato, D. (2006). Prinsip-prinsip Filsafat Hukum: Apa Itu dan Bagaimana Filsafat Hukum Indonesia Bekerja (Edition 6t). Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Richard, & Sudrajat, A. (2024). Textbook of Indonesian Agrarian Law: History and Development. Cendekia Press.

Safitri, F. A., Lumbanraja, A. D., & ALW, L. T. (2020). Positif dalam Pendaftaran Tanah di Kota Semarang. Notarius, 13(2), 788–802.

Soekanto, S. (2007). Pokok-Pokok Sosiologi Hukum. PT RajaGrafindo Persada.

Subagyono, B. S. A., Wahyudi, J., & Akbar, R. (2014). Kajian Penerapan Asas Ultra Petita Pada Petitum Ex Aequo Et Bono. Yuridika, 29(1), 100–112. https://doi.org/10.20473/ydk.v29i1.360

Subekti. (1985). Aneka Perjanjian. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Subekti, R. (1979). Hukum Perjanjian. Intermasa.

Downloads

Published

2026-08-25

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Reassessing Judicial Reasoning on the Cancellation of Land Sale and Purchase Agreements Due to Breach of Contract: Lessons from Decision No. 305/Pdt.G/2024/Pn.Bks. (2026). Amnesti: Jurnal Hukum, 8(2), 212-232. https://doi.org/10.37729/amnesti.v8i2.8108