Living Values and Creative Thinking Skills in The Physics Learning Process: How They Correlate?

Siti Sarah; Zuhdan Kun Prasetyo; Insih Wilujeng; Arum Adita

doi:10.37729/radiasi.v16i2.3025

Siti Sarah UIN Prof. K.H. Saifuddin Zuhri, Purwokerto, Jawa Tengah, Indonesia
Zuhdan Kun Prasetyo Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Insih Wilujeng Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Arum Adita Khon Kaen University, Thailand; Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto, Jawa Tengah, Indonesia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.37729/radiasi.v16i2.3025

Keywords: Living values, Creative thinking skills, Physics learning, Correlation

Abstract

People must be aware of the benefits and drawbacks of technology in the era of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. To survive the industrial revolution, one must have strong moral principles and be able to think creatively. 4.0. Living values are moral principles that a person possesses. The capacity to think creatively and solve issues effectively goes hand in hand. This follow-up study demonstrates how learning physics contextually based on local potential might enhance critical thinking abilities and ethical principles. The purpose of this study is to ascertain whether there is a connection between creative thinking abilities and living values. The research uses a one-shot case study design in a quasi-experiment method. Students in Wonosobo Regency's class IX high schools who had adopted a contextual physics learning model based on local potential made up the research participants. The research tools include tests of creative thinking abilities and observation sheets to gauge living values. Ten items are described as part of the test. Each instrument has undergone testing to ensure that it satisfies fair and trustworthy criteria. A correlation test is the method used for data analysis. With a significance of 0.295 (bigger than 0.05), the study's findings indicate no connection between having moral principles and having creative thinking abilities.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

D. A. Sisti, “How do high school students justify Internet plagiarism?,” Ethics Behav., vol. 17, no. 3, 2007, doi: 10.1080/10508420701519163.

J. Sureda-Negre, R. Comas-Forgas, dan M. F. Oliver-Trobat, “Academic plagiarism among secondary and high school students: Differences in gender and procrastination,” Comunicar, vol. 22, no. 44, 2015, doi: 10.3916/C44-2015-11.

M. J. Lin dan S. D. Levitt, “Catching Cheating Students,” Economica, vol. 87, no. 348, 2020, doi: 10.1111/ecca.12331.

H. Septanto, “Pengaruh Hoax dan Ujaran Kebencian Sebuah Cyber Crime dengan Teknologi Sederhana di Kehidupan Sosial Masyarakat,” J. Sains Dan Teknol., vol. 5, no. 2, 2018.

R. Mayeni, O. Syafti, dan Sefrinal, “Dampak Perkembangan Teknologi Dikalangan Remaja Dilihat dari Nilai-Nilai Karakter,” J. Penelit. Dan Pengabdi., vol. 7, no. 2, 2019.

F. Sholekhah, “Pendidikan Karakter melalui Revolusi Mental di Era Disruptif,” Model. J. Program Studi PGMI, vol. 6, no. 1, 2019, doi: 10.36835/modeling.v6i1.343.

K. Komalasari, “The Living Values-Based Contextual Learning to Develop the Students’ Character,” J. Soc. Sci., vol. 8, no. 2, hlm. 246–251, 2012, doi: 10.3844/jssp.2012.246.251.

T. Erdogan, R. Akkaya, dan S. Çelebi Akkaya, “The effect of the Van Hiele model based instruction on the creative thinking levels of 6th grade primary school students,” Kuram Ve Uygulamada Egitim Bilim., vol. 9, no. 1, hlm. 181–194, 2009.

H. Meintjes dan M. Grosser, “Creative thinking in prospective teachers: The status quo and the impact of contextual factors,” South Afr. J. Educ., vol. 30, no. 3, hlm. 361–386, 2010, doi: 10.15700/saje.v30n3a360.

E. Aizikovitsh-Udi dan M. Amit, “Developing the skills of critical and creative thinking by probability teaching,” dalam Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2011, hlm. 1087–1091. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.03.243.

S. Sarah, Z. K. Prasetyo, I. Wilujeng, A. Maftukhin, A. T. Saputra, dan D. Aswita, “Implementation of contextual physics learning models based on the local potential to improve creative thinking skills and living values,” dalam ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 2020. doi: 10.1145/3452144.3452254.

A. Bin Jamaluddin, S. Zubaidah, S. Mahanal, dan A. Gofur, “Character, creative thinking and learning achievement in higher education: How they are correlated,” dalam AIP Conference Proceedings, 2021. doi: 10.1063/5.0043184.

R. Indra, M. Kustati, A. Saregar, Warnis, Nelmawarni, dan Y. Q. Yusuf, “The effect of principals’ leadership towards effective learning at an indonesian secondary school,” Eur. J. Educ. Res., vol. 9, no. 3, hlm. 1063–1074, 2020, doi: 10.12973/eu-jer.9.3.1063.

K. Khadijah, I. Suciati, K. Khaerani, A. Manaf, dan S. Sutamrin, “Schools’ Character Education Values And Students’ Mathematics Learning Achievement: A Meta-Analysis,” Cakrawala Pendidik., vol. 40, no. 3, hlm. 670–683, 2021, doi: 10.21831/cp.v40i3.39924.

K. Kamid, S. Syaiful, R. Theis, S. Sufri, S. E. Septi, dan R. I. Widodo, “Traditional ‘Congklak’ Games and Cooperative Character in Mathematics Larning,” J. Ilm. Sekol. Dasar, vol. 5, no. 3, hlm. 443, 2021, doi: 10.23887/jisd.v5i3.37740.

J. S. Benninga, M. W. Berkowitz, dan P. Kuehn, “the Relationship of Character Education Implementation and Academic Achievement in Elementary Schools,” J. Character Educ., vol. 1, no. 1, hlm. 19–32, 2003.

S. Sarah, Z. K. Prasetyo, dan I. Wilujeng, “Development of living values (honesty) assessment instrument in learning process,” Int. J. Instr., vol. 12, no. 4, hlm. 443–458, 2019, doi: 10.29333/iji.2019.12429a.

S. Sarah, Z. Kun Prasetyo, dan I. Wilujeng, “Development of Living Values (Responsibilities) Assessment Instryments in Learning Physics,” 2018. doi: 10.2991/aecon-18.2018.39.

S. Sarah, “Peningkatan Keterampilan Berpikir Kreatif Melalui Pembelajaran Fisika Berbasis Potensi Lokal,” JIPFRI J. Inov. Pendidik. Fis. Dan Ris. Ilm., 2018, doi: 10.30599/jipfri.v2i2.344.

D. Zuchdi, Z. K. Prasetya, dan M. S. Masruri, Model Pendidikan Karakter Terintegrasi dalam Pembelajaran dan Pengembangan Kultur Sekolah. Yogyakarta: Multi Presindo, 2013.

D. Tillman, Living Values Activities for Young Adults. Jakarta: Grasindo, 2004.

S. Wartini dan R. Riyanti, “Pengaruh Pola Asuh Terhadap Perkembangan Karakter Sosial Anak Usia Dini,” CERIA Cerdas Energik Responsif Inov. Adapt., vol. 1, no. 2, hlm. 21, 2018, doi: 10.22460/ceria.v1i2.p21-27.

E. S. Cahyaningrum, S. Sudaryanti, dan N. A. Purwanto, “Pengembangan Nilai-Nilai Karakter Anak Usia Dini Melalui Pembiasaan dan Keteladanan,” J. Pendidik. Anak, vol. 6, no. 2, 2017, doi: 10.21831/jpa.v6i2.17707.

N. Nurjannah, “Mengembangkan Kecerdasan Sosial Emosional Anak Usia Dini Melalui Keteladanan,” Hisbah J. Bimbing. Konseling Dan Dakwah Islam, vol. 14, no. 1, 2017, doi: 10.14421/hisbah.2017.141-05.

E. Cinda dan A. Jacobus, “Melalui Keteladanan Dan Pembiasaan,” Pendidik. Dasar Indones., vol. 1, no. September, 2016.

S. Manan, “Pembinaan Akhlak Mulia Melalui Keteladanan dan Pembiasaan,” J. Pendidik. Agama Islam-Ta’lim, vol. XV, no. 2, 2017.

U. Farida, F. Agustini, dan H. Wakhyudin, “Efektivitas Model Pembelajaran Scramble Berbasis Kontekstual Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis IPS Siswa Kelas III SD Negeri Kebondalem 01 BatanG,” J. Ilm. Sekol. Dasar, vol. 1, no. 3, hlm. 192, 2017, doi: 10.23887/jisd.v1i3.11840.

Roediger dan L. Henry, Psychology. Boston: Litle Brown & Company, 1987.

N. W. Suarmini, “Keluarga Sebagai Wahanan Pertama dan Utama Pendidikan Karakter Anak,” J. Sos. Hum., vol. 7, no. 1, 2014, doi: 10.12962/j24433527.v7i1.599.

H. Purnomo, “Peran Orang Tua dalam Optimalisasi Tumbuh Kembang Anak untuk Membangun Karakter Anak Usia Dini,” Pros. Semin. Nas. Parent., 2013.