Peer Review Process

JIPS: Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Sains will publish the only paper strictly following JIPS guidelines and manuscript preparation. Those papers are read by editorial members (upon the field of specialization) and will be screened by Managing Editor to meet the necessary criteria of JIPS publication. JIPS using the Blind Peer Review. Manuscripts will be sent to two peer-reviewers based on their historical experience in reviewing manuscripts or based on their field of specialization. JIPS has reviewing forms in order to keep the same items reviewed by two reviewers. Then the editorial board will make a decision upon the reviewer's comments or advice. Reviewers will give their assessment on originality, clarity of presentation, contribution to the field/science, JIPS has four kinds of decisions:

  • Accepted, as it is
  • Accepted by Minor Revisions (let authors revised with stipulated time)
  • Accepted by Major Revisions (let authors revised with stipulated time)
  • Declined (generally, on grounds of outside of scope and aim, major technical description problems, lack of clarity of presentation)

For checking Plagiarism, JIPS Editorial Board will screen plagiarism using Turnitin Program maximum of 20%. If it is found plagiarism indication, the editorial board will reject the manuscript immediately.